Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note3's score of 77.7. Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a lot newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, it's much thicker and much heavier. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores.
Galaxy Note3 takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and washed colors and a way smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a higher resolution back facing camera and a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a superior battery duration than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.