Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Note4's general score of 77.6. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a much newer phone than Galaxy Note4, but it is way heavier and thicker. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little bit better display than Galaxy Note4, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a just a little higher display density.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a very superior storage for apps and games than Galaxy Note4, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note4 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs and/or video in low light situations and a tinier sensor capturing worse quality photographs and videos, it also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera and a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.