Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 is slightly better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having an 80.2 score against 80.1. The Galaxy Note5 is an extremely older device than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but Samsung was able to make it a lot lighter and a lot thinner. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy Note5. They have a Octa-Core processor and a 4 GB RAM.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little sharper display than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a bit higher pixels density. Galaxy Note5 shoots greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking less light and washed colors and a way tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution and a way higher (4K) video definition.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features much more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.