Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note7's global score of 79.5. Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a much newer cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy Note7, but it's much thicker and way heavier. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1440 x 2560, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a higher number of cores. The Galaxy Note7 captures better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light captures, and they both have a 12 mega-pixels resolution back camera, the Galaxy Note7 also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.