Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's general score of 80.1. Even though Samsung Galaxy S10 is older than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's body is noticeably lighter and much thinner. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has an older 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy S10 has a display that is very similar to the screen in Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although the Galaxy S10 has a just a little lower quantity of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3040. Samsung Galaxy S10 has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 shoots way better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, a same size back-facing camera sensor and the same resolution back camera, the Galaxy S10 also has a way higher 3840x2160 video definition. The Galaxy S10 features a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy S10 also has 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features improved battery performance than Galaxy S10, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
The Galaxy S10 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.