Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 global score. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is an older phone than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but it is notably lighter and a lot thinner anyway. These devices include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher display density. Galaxy S10 5G features just a little better processing power than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same camera sensor size, a same size diafragm aperture and a same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution. The Galaxy S10 5G has more memory to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a battery lifetime that's very similar to Galaxy XCover FieldPro's battery duration.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, the Galaxy S10 5G is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.