Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a general score of 89.7, which is better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 score. The Galaxy S10 Lite is a noticeably thinner and way lighter cellphone than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when both of them were released with only a couple months difference. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixels count per inch in the display.
Galaxy S10 Lite has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S10 Lite has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy S10 Lite takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a lot larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a back camera with a way better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a battery performance that is just as good as the Galaxy XCover FieldPro one.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Galaxy S10 Lite is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.