Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 global score. Samsung Galaxy S10e's design is incredibly thinner and notably lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although it was released about 13 months before. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Galaxy S10e has a way bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy S10e also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much longer battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Samsung Galaxy S10e has a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a camera with a 12 mega pixels, a same size back camera sensor and a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S10e is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.