Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a 94.8 score against 80.1. Although Galaxy S20 and the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released with only a few months difference, Galaxy S20 is noticeably lighter and a lot thinner. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but Galaxy S20 has an older 13 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy S20 features a little better processing power than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro and Galaxy S20 both feature quite similar displays, because although the Galaxy S20 has a quite lower pixel count per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger screen and a little bit higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have a 12 MP camera in the back, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality photos and videos and a much better video quality.
Galaxy S20 features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little better battery performance than Galaxy S20, because it has a 13% bigger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.