Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is much better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a 90.8 score against 80.1. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a a lot lighter and incredibly thinner cellphone than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though both were released only a few months apart. These devices have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has the older 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater display density. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S20 FE has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 FE and Galaxy XCover FieldPro have extremely similar battery performance. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE captures a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photography, and they both have a camera with a 12 mega-pixels, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a way better (4K) video resolution and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.