Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.97 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black | Gray, Phantom pink, Violet and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 722.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 has an overall score of 91.8, which is better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's score of 80.1. Galaxy S21 is a newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and much lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S21 has the older 11 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy S21 features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S21 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy S21 features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and way lesser pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger display.
Galaxy S21 has a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video, and they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy S21 also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S21, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy S21, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy S21 is also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.