Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 98.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 8.04 ounces |
| Black | Phantom black and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 966.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 Ultra has a general score of 98.1, which is a lot better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 score. Galaxy S21 Ultra is a newer phone, and it's also noticeably thinner and somewhat lighter than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S21 Ultra has older 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel quantity per display inch, it also counts with a lot larger display and a little higher 1440 x 3200 resolution. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S21 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy S21 Ultra has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S21 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photos and video, it also counts with a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a much better video definition.
The Galaxy S21 Ultra features a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy S21 Ultra not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.