Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a 93.4 score against 80.1. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 has older 13 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Galaxy S22 is a newer cellphone, and it's also incredibly thinner and incredibly lighter than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
The Galaxy S22 and Galaxy XCover FieldPro both have very similar processors, and although the Galaxy S22 has more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S22 features a more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a way worse pixels quantity per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a way larger sensor and a back-facing camera with a way better 50 MP resolution.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 22 percent more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Galaxy S22 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.