Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a score of 95.4 against 80.1. These devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has older 13 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer cellphone, and it's also lighter and much thinner than Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a lot larger screen and a slightly better 1440 x 3088px resolution. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit superior processor than Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a back facing camera with much more MP and a much better video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a bit more money than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.