Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-04 | -- |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | -- |
| 9.03 ounces | -- |
| Black | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having an 82.6 score against 80.1. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 has an older 14 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Galaxy S25 is a a lot thinner and a lot lighter device than Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a way worse screen density, it also counts with a larger screen. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much better performance than Galaxy S25, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting photos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much bigger sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos, a lot higher video quality and a much better 50 MP resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy S25 is also very cheap compared to the other devices, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.