Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-04 | -- |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | -- |
| 9.03 ounces | -- |
| Black | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a global score of 90.7 against 80.1. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has the older 14 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a a lot lighter and incredibly thinner phone than Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a just a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a much larger screen and a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features an extremely better processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a greater storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a little better battery life than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking photographs and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a way better resolution camera, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a lot larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.