Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy S5 Plus's 78.1 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Galaxy S5 Plus has Android 4.4.2, so it provides the user a lot of extra features. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro body is extremely newer than Galaxy S5 Plus's, but it's thicker and a lot heavier.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with more RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The Galaxy S5 Plus has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although it has a lot lower screen density and a lot lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, they both have a display of the same size.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 48 GB more internal memory. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S5 Plus has a greater camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier sensor shooting worse quality videos and pictures and a much smaller aperture, it also counts with a much better (4K) video definition and a way more megapixels camera.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy S5 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S5 Plus. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Galaxy S5 Plus, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.