Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S6
32 GBSM-G920F
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 83.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2015-04-11 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| Plastic | Aluminium and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 260.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2550mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 has an overall score of 83.5, which is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 score. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S6 has 5.0 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy S6 is notably older than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's body is incredibly lighter and extremely thinner.
Samsung Galaxy S6 features a sharper display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro. They have the same display density, a display with the same size and the same resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The Galaxy S6 has a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 also counts with an additional graphics processing unit and a 64 bits processor.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 takes a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera sensor and a way tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video resolution and a way higher resolution camera in the back. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6, because it has more internal memory and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better battery performance than Galaxy S6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy S6 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.