Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-04-04 | -- |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | -- |
| Black | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 Active has an overall score of 80.9, which is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's score of 80.1. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S6 Active has an older 5.0 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Galaxy S6 Active's body is extremely thinner and a lot lighter than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Both of them have a display of the same size, exactly the same resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a graphics co-processor and a 64-bits CPU.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a little bit better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera sensor capturing lower quality videos and photos and a way smaller aperture which is not good for taking images in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much better video resolution and a camera with a much better 16 megapixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a way bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features greater battery duration than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S6 Active not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.