Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S6
DuosSM-G9200
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 87.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2015-04-11 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| Plastic | Aluminium and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 252.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2550mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 has a score of 87.4, which is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's score of 80.1. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S6 has an older 5.0 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Galaxy S6 construction is noticeably lighter and incredibly thinner than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although it was released 5 years before.
The Galaxy S6 features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S6 also counts with a graphics co-processor and a 64-bit processor. The Samsung Galaxy S6 has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Both of them have a higher pixel amount in each inch in the display, a same size screen and the same exact 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S6 captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor which provides a lower image and video quality and a much tinier aperture, it also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S6, because it has a 76% greater battery size.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy S6 is also a lot cheaper, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.