Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S7, having a global score of 80.1 against 79.5. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a noticeably newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy S7, but it is notably thicker and incredibly heavier. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better performance than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a greater number of cores.
The Galaxy S7 counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro. They have a same size display, a higher quantity of pixels per screen inch and the same exact 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy S7 takes greater photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have a back facing camera with a 12 mega-pixels resolution, the Galaxy S7 also counts with a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a lot better video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S7, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy S7. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Galaxy S7, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.