Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, with an 80.1 score against 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro design is notably newer, but a lot thicker and extremely heavier than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. Galaxy S7 Active has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. They have a same size display, the same pixels density and exactly the same resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better performance than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has more CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking photographs and video in low light situations, and they both have a back facing camera with a 12 megapixels, the Galaxy S7 Active also counts with a lot higher (4K) video definition.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.