Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with an 83.3 score against 80.1. Although the Samsung Galaxy S9 is older than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's construction is noticeably lighter and noticeably thinner. Galaxy S9 counts with a display that's very similar to the Galaxy XCover FieldPro one, because although the Galaxy S9 has a just a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a bit larger display.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little bit more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S9, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Galaxy S9 has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same camera sensor size and a back facing camera with a 12 MP, the Galaxy S9 also has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Galaxy S9 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.