Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 general score. These phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has the previous 11 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a somewhat lighter and way thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though they were released with only a couple of months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels quantity per inch of screen. Galaxy XCover Pro has as much memory for games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, both of them have equal 64 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy XCover Pro. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4050mAh. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much smaller back-facing camera sensor which gives a much lower image and video quality and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.