Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.14 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's overall score of 80.1. These devices include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the older 11 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's design is newer, lighter and noticeably thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit faster processor than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 36 percent greater battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a bigger aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited environments.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy Z Flip 3 is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.