Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is a lot thinner and much lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when they were only released with a few months difference. These phones come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a better memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same resolution back camera and a same size sensor, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with a much higher video resolution.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.