Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 overall score. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is a little bit heavier but much thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and both were only released 6 months apart.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1440 x 2560px, it also counts with a lot better amount of pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a quite bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a battery duration that is just as good as the battery life in Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have a back camera with a 12 megapixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.