Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.14 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a score of 90.6 against 80.1. Both devices in this review have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the previous 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a little heavier than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's a lot thinner and newer.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit worse 1440 x 2560 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with way more pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a way larger aperture for better images and video in low-light situations. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.