Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 91 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-05-22 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.54 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Black | Black and Purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3840 x 1644 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 643 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia 1 II has an overall score of 91, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 score. Although Xperia 1 II and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released only a few months apart, Xperia 1 II is way lighter and extremely thinner. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xperia 1 II has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Sony Xperia 1 II counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Sony Xperia 1 II also has 4 GB more RAM. The Xperia 1 II counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a larger display, a quite greater screen pixel density and a higher resolution of 1644 x 3840px.
The Xperia 1 II counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, and they both have a back facing camera with a 12 MP, the Xperia 1 II also counts with a way higher (4K) video resolution and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality.
The Xperia 1 II counts with much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit longer battery performance than Xperia 1 II, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.