Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-06-11 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.08 x 2.69 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia 10 III has an overall score of 83.7, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. These phones have Android operating system, but Sony Xperia 10 III has an older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Sony Xperia 10 III body is newer, incredibly lighter and noticeably thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better display than Xperia 10 III, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better pixel number in each inch in the screen. Xperia 10 III has a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB and more internal storage.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit superior processing unit than Xperia 10 III, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro and the Xperia 10 III both feature extremely similar battery performance. Xperia 10 III features a superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light photography and a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have a 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back, the Xperia 10 III also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.