Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 87.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-10-12 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and Grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 848.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 449 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia 5 II is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a general score of 87.2 against 80.1. Even though the Sony Xperia 5 II and the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released with only 6 months difference, the Sony Xperia 5 II is incredibly thinner and a lot lighter.
The Xperia 5 II counts with a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xperia 5 II also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little more vivid display than Sony Xperia 5 II, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
The Sony Xperia 5 II has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a little better battery life than Xperia 5 II, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity.
Xperia 5 II counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same resolution back camera, the Xperia 5 II also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher (4K) video quality.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Xperia 5 II is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.