Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.18 x 2.68 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black | Black, Green and Pink |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 449 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia 5 III is much better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a 90.5 score against 80.1. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Xperia 5 III has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Xperia 5 III is a newer cellphone, and it's also notably lighter and a lot thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Sony Xperia 5 III features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Sony Xperia 5 III also has more RAM. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better screen than Sony Xperia 5 III, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen density and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Xperia 5 III captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, and they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the Xperia 5 III also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a much bigger back camera sensor taking much higher quality photographs.
Xperia 5 III counts with much more storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB and 256 GB internal storage. The Sony Xperia 5 III and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro count with extremely similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.