Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 94.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-01-26 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.70 x 3.00 x 0.40 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 2500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3840 x 1644 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 643 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 22.92 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia PRO is much better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a 94.3 score against 80.1. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Xperia PRO has an older 10 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Xperia PRO's body is newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Xperia PRO counts with a bit better display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a better 1644 x 3840 resolution, a larger screen and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Xperia PRO counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory.
Xperia PRO features a bit faster processor than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xperia PRO also has 4 GB more RAM. Xperia PRO captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a 12 MP back facing camera, the Xperia PRO also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a little bit longer battery duration than Sony Xperia PRO, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Xperia PRO is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.