Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than the Xperia XZ Premium's score of 79.8. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is extremely newer, but heavier and extremely thicker than the Xperia XZ Premium. Sony Xperia XZ Premium has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a bit bigger display, a higher pixel number in each inch of screen and a lot higher resolution of 2160 x 3840 pixels.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little bit better processing power than Sony Xperia XZ Premium. They have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount.
Sony Xperia XZ Premium has a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a way better video definition, a much more megapixels camera and a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a superior battery life than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 39% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.