Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Premium has a global score of 82.2, which is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's general score of 80.1. Xperia XZ2 Premium's construction is a little lighter and somewhat thinner than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though it was released about a year before. Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a greater pixel amount in each inch in the display, a quite bigger display and a lot better 2160 x 3840px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little bit better memory capacity for applications and games than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Xperia XZ2 Premium features a little bit better performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xperia XZ2 Premium also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Xperia XZ2 Premium captures a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video quality, a bigger back camera sensor and a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with superior battery life than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 27% larger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Xperia XZ2 Premium is also the cheapest one, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.