Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is just a bit better than the Sony Xperia XZs, getting a general score of 80.1 against 77.2. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro construction is way newer, but a lot heavier and extremely thicker than Sony Xperia XZs. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more powerful processor than Xperia XZs, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has more cores.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better looking screen than Xperia XZs, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better display pixels density. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xperia XZs, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB and more internal memory.
The Sony Xperia XZs counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a way more MP camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a superior battery life than Xperia XZs, because it has a 55 percent bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xperia XZs, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xperia XZs. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Xperia XZs, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.