Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Plastic | Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than TCL 20 Pro 5G's 76.1 global score. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version and TCL 20 Pro 5G has Android 11 version, so it counts with some nice extra features. Even being the best cellphone we compare here, it must be told that it's also an older, much thicker and much heavier cellphone.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little better hardware performance than TCL 20 Pro 5G, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better looking display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better pixel count in each display inch.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 192 GB more internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The TCL 20 Pro 5G's battery life is just as good as Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's battery performance.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a greater camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for taking images and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a way better video definition, a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a much larger sensor taking way better quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.