Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-12-28 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.01 x 2.75 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Green and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than the Xiaomi 12, with a general score of 80.1 against 78.8. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Xiaomi 12 has Android 12 version, counting with lots of additional features and improved performance. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro body is older, notably thicker and heavier than the Xiaomi 12.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro and the Xiaomi 12 feature really similar displays, because although the Xiaomi 12 has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and way lesser pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bigger display. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi 12, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much better performing CPU than Xiaomi 12, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi 12's battery life is just as good as Galaxy XCover FieldPro's battery duration. Xiaomi 12 shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking images or videos in low light environments, it also counts with a much bigger camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs, a back facing camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a much higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.