Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-12-28 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Green and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.78 inches (1/1.28") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.76 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than Xiaomi 12 Pro, with an 80.1 score against 79.6. These devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Xiaomi 12 Pro has Android 12 version. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is better than Xiaomi 12 Pro, it must be told that it's also older, extremely heavier and way thicker.
The Xiaomi 12 Pro features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a quite inferior count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a really larger screen and a slightly higher 1440 x 3200 resolution. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a really superior hardware performance than Xiaomi 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Xiaomi 12 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a back camera with much more MP, a lot larger sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos and a way higher video resolution.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a quite bigger memory for applications and games than Xiaomi 12 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi 12 Pro has a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.