Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2022-03-15 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.01 x 2.75 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black | Blue, Grey and Purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 50.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than Xiaomi 12X, with an 80.1 score against 77.8. These devices come with Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version and Xiaomi 12X has Android 11. Despite being the best cellphone in our current comparison, it must be noted that it is also an older, a lot heavier and much thicker cellphone.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much greater hardware performance than Xiaomi 12X, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Xiaomi 12X counts with a display that is very similar to the screen in Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although the Xiaomi 12X has a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a much worse count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger screen.
Xiaomi 12X takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light images and video, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a much more MP back camera. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi 12X, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro and the Xiaomi 12X feature really similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.