Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 84.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2024-02-22 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.35 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.75 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Titanium Gray and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.51") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 14 Ultra has a general score of 84.4, which is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's general score of 80.1. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi 14 Ultra has the older 14 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra body is way newer, somewhat lighter and notably thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
The Xiaomi 14 Ultra has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a quite lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a way larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a really superior hardware performance than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Xiaomi 14 Ultra has a better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi 14 Ultra has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light photos, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Xiaomi 14 Ultra has just a little better battery duration than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.