Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-03-28 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black | Black and Silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting an 82.3 score against 80.1. Xiaomi Black Shark 2's design is somewhat lighter and thinner than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though it was released just a little over a year before. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has the older 10 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels quantity per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with more memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 takes way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a camera with lot more mega-pixels, a lot higher (4K) video definition and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality pictures.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.