Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a general score of 86.6, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 score. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has the previous 10 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Xiaomi Black Shark 3's construction is incredibly thinner and somewhat lighter than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when they were only released with a couple months difference.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better display density.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 4720mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a camera with way more MP, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.