Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 83.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-05-25 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.45 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black | Aurora Blue, Cosmic Gray and Dream White |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4160mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with an 83.6 score against 80.1. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even when the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite and the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released only a few months apart, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite is much lighter and incredibly thinner.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels amount in each inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting photos and video in low light environments, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality photos and videos, a lot higher video definition and a camera with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, because it has an 8 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.