Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 93.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-04-21 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black | Alpine white and Solstice grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 13.86 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro has a general score of 93.1, which is better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 overall score. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro is a somewhat lighter and extremely thinner cellphone than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although both of them were only released with a couple of months difference.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel count per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much higher video quality, a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro has a greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro and the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro both have quite similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.