Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-10-01 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.62 ounces |
| Black | Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10T has a general score of 87.9, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's overall score of 80.1. Although the Xiaomi Mi 10T and the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released with only 6 months difference, the Xiaomi Mi 10T is incredibly thinner and lighter. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi 10T has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a quite bigger storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Mi 10T features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi 10T also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 10T shoots way better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more megapixels, a much bigger sensor and a much higher video definition.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T has just a little better battery duration than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.