Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 90 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-10-01 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black | Aurora blue, Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has a global score of 90, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's score of 80.1. These phones work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has the older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Although the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro and the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released only a few months apart, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro is lighter and noticeably thinner.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per inch of display.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light images, it also counts with a way bigger sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality, a back camera with a much better 108 megapixels resolution and a lot better video quality.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.