Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 88.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-02-08 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| Black | Horizon blue and Midnight gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 has an overall score of 88.8, which is much better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 global score. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 11 has older 11 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Xiaomi Mi 11 is a newer phone, and it's also incredibly thinner and extremely lighter than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 features a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi 11 also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 11 counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a lot larger display and a slightly higher 1440 x 3200px resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot smaller aperture, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a much higher 108 MP resolution camera and a way bigger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photos.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 11, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Mi 11 counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 2 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.