Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Black | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| Plastic | Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's overall score of 80.1. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is a newer device, and it's also just a little bit lighter and way thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a much better display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a quite inferior pixels amount in each screen inch, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a lot bigger screen.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor taking much better quality photographs and videos, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a bit better battery life than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.