Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 89.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-05-31 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| Black | Celestial Silver, Cosmic Black and Frosty White |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4520mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11i is much better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with an 89.5 score against 80.1. Xiaomi Mi 11i is a newer cellphone, and it is also a lot lighter and much thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Xiaomi Mi 11i has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi 11i also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi 11i counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way lower quantity of pixels in each inch in the display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a way larger display. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 11i, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Mi 11i features just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 4520mAh battery capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 11i has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light images and video, it also counts with a camera in the back with a way better 108 MP resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.